Thank you Louis! I wonder, is there a technique that lawmakers and judges can use to combat the limitations that come with the transposition of words as they investigate or preside over criminal proceedings? I note that "Gain of Function" has been continued, but avoided legal ramifications by Pfizer through the use of "directed evolution".
It appears that "the letter of the law" (with a twisted alphabet) is a common technique to use to escape accountability.
Or answering a question with a question.
Or a non-answer for an answer.
Or the judicious use of qualifiers (Fauci was a pro at this) in their answers to avoid judgement.
How could one "nail jello to the wall" when they use tactics like this?
Thank you Louis! I wonder, is there a technique that lawmakers and judges can use to combat the limitations that come with the transposition of words as they investigate or preside over criminal proceedings? I note that "Gain of Function" has been continued, but avoided legal ramifications by Pfizer through the use of "directed evolution".
It appears that "the letter of the law" (with a twisted alphabet) is a common technique to use to escape accountability.
Or answering a question with a question.
Or a non-answer for an answer.
Or the judicious use of qualifiers (Fauci was a pro at this) in their answers to avoid judgement.
How could one "nail jello to the wall" when they use tactics like this?
Exciting topic for a substack. This will presumably serve us well in psyops to come.